![]() ![]() A knee-worn pedometer has recently been recommended for detecting all walking activities in stroke patients, with the exception of high intensity walking. In hemiparetic gait, speed accelerations at the hip were often of insufficient magnitude to be registered. Pedometers tend to undercount steps during slower gaits when the device is placed on the hip. Pedometer are prescribed as a less expensive and simple alternative for taking objective measurements of physical activity in stroke patients. In addition, hemiparetic gait disturbances and/or arm movements causes unreliable recordings in accelerometry systems,. Commonly reported major shortcomings include the loss of data due to noncompliance and the failure of activity monitors due to malfunctioning or loosening of the equipment, –. Activity monitoring also allows the possibility of testing a large sample, and recording continuously for long periods under free-living conditions. Advantages of activity monitors include their objectivity and the fact that they do not rely on cognitive/memory skills. Activity monitors based on accelerometry, measure acceleration, as expressed in energy expenditure and/or ambulatory movement. There is considerable interest in exploring valid and reliable instruments for evaluating the level of daily physical activity and in identifying physical activity patterns to guide intervention strategies.Ī variety of objective methods have been used to measure daily physical activity in stroke patients, including activity monitors – and pedometers –. Several observational studies have described decreases in the activity patterns of sub-acute and chronic stroke patients –. ![]() Stroke patients have reduced levels of physical activity due to the nature of their impairments. Increased daily physical activity reduces cardiovascular risk for people with and without disabilities. The importance of physical activity promoting health has been well documented. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Ĭompeting interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.įunding: This research is funded by a research grant (G841) from the Artesis University College Antwerp, Belgium. Received: NovemAccepted: Published: June 6, 2014Ĭopyright: © 2014 Vanroy et al. Quinn, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom (2014) Is a Coded Physical Activity Diary Valid for Assessing Physical Activity Level and Energy Expenditure in Stroke Patients? PLoS ONE 9(6):Įditor: Terence J. Citation: Vanroy C, Vanlandewijck Y, Cras P, Feys H, Truijen S, Michielsen M, et al. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |